Tags: Drug Trafficking EssayEssay Outline Persuasive SentenceDo My English Homework For MeMass Effect AssignmentAssignment.ComCreative College Admissions EssaysNeed Help With HomeworkAntigone Essay Topics
A field experiment finds that the BTB policy increased, rather than decreased, racial disparities in job applicant call-backs.”)Institution of authors: University of California, Los Angeles Main finding: Growing up in an affluent neighborhood leads to better economic outcomes as an adult.Nominating economist: James Heckman, University of Chicago, winner of the 2000 Nobel prize in economics Specialization: Econometrics and education Why?
The treated group was twice as likely to apply and twice as likely to enroll as the control group, and the enrollment increase did not come at the expense of more selective colleges..”Nominating economist: Raj Chetty, Stanford University Specialization: Public economics and equality of opportunity Why?
“People have been talking about how we can get more low- and middle-income students to attend highly selective colleges for a long time.
“‘Ban the Box’ (BTB) policies were intended to reduce racial disparities in hiring by restricting employers from asking about the criminal backgrounds of job applicants.
But withholding information can have negative consequences on some the policy is meant to help.
Nominating economist: David Card, University of California, Berkeley Specialization: Labor markets Why?
“There is a lot of interest in the past couple of years on how the criminal justice system creates racial disparities.
The results are important for two reasons: (1) They show how detrimental lead exposure is, and (2) they show that the CDC intervention works to mitigate many of lead’s effects!
Kids who get the intervention see large improvements in educational outcomes and antisocial behavior – including fewer arrests for violent crime.
The chosen studies capture the concerns of 2018, with subjects ranging from criminal justice to how to best design an auction.
Here are their picks: Institutions of authors: University of Michigan, Syracuse University, and the College Board Main finding: Encouraging high-achieving, low-income students to apply to a university, along with the promise of aid, makes them much more likely to go to a good school.