Essay Faith Knowledge Habermas

To the extent that the wider public shares those conceptions of human flourishing, the arguments are intelligible.

Tags: Does A Thesis Statement Have To Be ArguableMarketing Research Proposal EssayGreat Essays 2nd EditionSatire Essay IdeasA Level Chemistry Aspirin CourseworkEssays On Hockey In CanadaEssay Expository

It’s not even clear that it would be right to speak of these religious forays into public discourse as involving “translation.” The idea that divorce in Ireland or same-sex marriage in the United States will hurt families is not the secular equivalent of a religious idea.

The sense, rather, is that religious teachings are relevant to human flourishing.

Dillon has found that pro-change Catholics use theological arguments to claim their legitimate social identity.

“The Catholics I had studied,” she says, “were clearly grounding their emancipatory claims for greater equality within religious reasoning.

Living in a country where you don’t know the language means you have a great excuse for not talking to Jehovah’s Witnesses. Sociologist Michelle Dillon makes a similar (but not identical) critique of Habermas and the post-secular in her interview with the Religious Studies Project.

To be completely honest, I actually did understand the two Witnesses when they came to my door. She notes that in his earlier work on communicative action, Habermas didn’t speak of religious participation in public discourse, implicitly excluding it.He writes that “The cleavage between secular knowledge and revealed knowledge cannot be bridged” (An Awareness of What is Missing: 17). Perhaps Habermas hasn’t seen such bridges, but they are quite common.Religious people regularly enter into conversations with those from other religions as well as those with no religion.But why start with the assumption that translation will be a problem?Dillon, in her work, has looked at Catholic bishop’s arguments against legalizing divorce in Ireland. There has been much theorizing under the heading of “post-secular” about the problem of religious participation in public discourse. They don’t expect to be accommodated in conversation; they accommodate.And it was the sort of reasoning that would appeal or could persuade people who were Catholic or not Catholic.” The same could be said of Jehovah’s Witnesses’ more controversial practice of rejecting blood transfusion.While the argument is religious — blood is connected to the soul— it is not unintelligible to those who don’t share the presuppositions of Witnesses. They cannot, that is, just appeal to divine authority when they come to your door or come to the public square. What is sacred to them must be re-conceived in reasoned discourse as secular. For the religious to speak to those who do not share their ontological presuppositions, it is said, in public discussions in pluralistic, democratic societies, it must be necessary for there to be a reformulation of religious arguments into publicly accessible, this-world terms. Yet it illustrates, if nothing else, that there might be a problem with framing the matter of religious people dialoguing with those who do not share their religion as a “problem.” As philosopher Jürgen Habermas explains the problem, religious language can be allowed into the public sphere, but only on certain conditions: “The truth contents of religious contributions can enter into the institutionalized practice of deliberation and decision-making only when the necessary translation already occurs in the pre-parliamentarian domain, i.e. citizens of faith may make public contributions in their own religious language only subject to the translation proviso” (Between Naturalism and Religion 131-32).

SHOW COMMENTS

Comments Essay Faith Knowledge Habermas

  • Who Is Habermas? Why Habermas? - California State University.
    Reply

    Essays by Curran and Takata Habermas Thinking Beyond and Through Privileged Categories Who Is Habermas? Why Habermas? Why Dear Habermas? On Habermas and Postmodernism On Choosing the Academy as a Laboratory for Research on Public Discourse On the Academy as a Non-Learning Auto-Poietic System Habermas/ Foucault Comparisons, Contrasts…

  • Derrida’s Faith and Knowledge A Workshop Northern Theory.
    Reply

    Re-reading Derrida’s ‘Faith and Knowledge’ A Northern Theory School/Department of Theology and Religious Studies Workshop at the University of Nottingham In his enigmatic 1994 essay ‘Faith and Knowledge The Two Sources of “Religion” within the Limits of Reason Alone’, Jacques Derrida explores the troubled place of religion in.…

  • Free habermas Essays and Papers -
    Reply

    Habermas's Notion of the Colonization of the Life-world. - Habermas presented his theories of colonization of the life-world based on classic theorists, including such sociologists as Weber, Durkheim, Parsons, and Mead and Marx. At the heart of his theories was communication.…

  • Studying Jurgen Habermas’s Essay “Modernity-An Incomplete.
    Reply

    On the eve of getting Theodor W. Adorno prize, in 1980 Jurgen Habermas delivered a lecture and the essay is an outcome of that. The essay highlights how ‘modernity’ as a project fails. He has taken many aspects like; aesthetic modernity, cultural and societal modernization, the project Enlightenment and negating culture, to present them in different sections of the essay.…

  • Jürgen Habermas Key Concepts // Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews.
    Reply

    Barbara Fultner ed. Jürgen Habermas Key Concepts, Acumen Press, 2011, 264pp. $24.95 pbk, ISBN 9781844652372. Reviewed by David Ingram, Loyola University Chicago Anyone who has read Habermas knows how daunting his writing can be. Aside from the notorious density and abstractness of his prose.…

  • Ratzinger, Habermas, and Pera on Public Reason and Religion.
    Reply

    In his conversations with Habermas and Pera, Ratzinger is focusing on the first of these two; that is, he is respecting their lack of faith in God, and then agreeing with their idea that Christian principles have something to offer the public sphere that can be known by all people of good will.…

  • Taking Religion Seriously? Habermas on. - Cambridge Core
    Reply

    Abstract. This article evaluates Jürgen Habermas's attempt to reopen political liberalism to religion. In trying to “take religion seriously,” Habermas goes further than John Rawls and other liberal theorists by affirming that religious traditions articulate truths on which democratic societies continue to depend for their civic and moral health.…

  • An Awareness of What is Missing Faith & Reason in a Post.
    Reply

    Essentially Habermas's essay boils down to "can't we all just get along?" -- the 'we' being faith, reason, agnosticism, and atheism -- and his responders get all excited to talk about how they, Kant, and Hegel find this question very complicated.…

  • Rawls And Habermas Approaches On The Idea Of Reason And.
    Reply

    The Public Sphere By Habermas 960 Words 4 Pages. In his essay, The Public Sphere, Habermas examines the concept of “The Public Sphere” in historical-sociological perspective, particularly in the eighteenth century. Habermas analyzes the difference between what is a private realm and what is a public realm between the society and the state.…

  • Does Reason Know What It Is Missing? - The New York Times
    Reply

    The “naive faith” Habermas criticizes is not a faith in what science can do — it can do anything — but a faith in science’s ability to provide reasons, aside from the reason of its own keeping on going, for doing it and for declining to do it in a particular direction because to do so would be wrong.…

The Latest from csgo777.ru ©