Tags: Essay About Science Technology And SocietyWrite A Descriptive Essay About Your Role ModelEssay For Academic IeltsScarlet Ibis Thesis EssayWww.Critical Thinking.ComIdeas For Argumentative Essay
This process first helps people and their communities recognize the resources that lie within themselves to make change possible.My personal worldview explains the way I view and live life through the assumptions and beliefs I hold in response to the world around me.Individuals, families, churches, schools, and other groups sponsor specific children or specific community projects in their own country or abroad.
I believe I was created for a specific reason and purpose. I believe that God exists and that he is the creator of everything that exists.
“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God, John 1:1” (NIV). The verse that explains that God has always existed is, “Revelation , I am the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the End” (NIV).
Protracted conflict sometimes results from a clash between differing world-views.
One group's most fundamental and cherished assumptions about the best way to live may differ radically from the values held by another group. Parties may have different standards of rightness and goodness and give fundamentally different answers to serious moral questions. When groups have different ideas about the good life, they often stress the importance of different things, and may develop radically different or incompatible goals. Because values and morals tend to be quite stable, people are often unwilling to negotiate or compromise with respect to these topics.
“For we are God's handiwork, created in Christ Jesus to do good works, which God prepared in advance for us to do, Ephesians ” (NIV).
With this knowledge I know that God has created me exactly the way I should be and that he has given me talents and skills enough to do all he asks of me to do.When modernists carry out acts regarded as obligatory or good within their own moral order, "these very acts offend traditionalists." Inter-racial or inter-religious marriages, for example, are seen by many as one outgrowth of inclusivity and tolerance.The freedom to marry anyone is a "right." Traditionalists, however, would see it as evil -- harming their race or religion.Indeed, if the basic substantive issues of the conflict are deeply embedded in the participants' moral orders, these issues are likely to be quite intractable. A group's moral order is related to its practices, its patterns of thinking, and its patterns of language.As they are socialized, group members learn to center their judgments on values and procedures fundamental to their own common culture. Their moral order provides the set of meanings through which they understand their experience and make judgments about what is valuable and important. These patterns of meaning shape the way that individuals understand facts and issues and help them to develop a sense of identity.For example, sometimes people distinguish between moral orders built on rights and those built on virtues. Each one is associated with particular forms of society and ways of being human.While a rights-based approach is associated with the Enlightenment and modernity, a virtues-based approach emerges from traditional society.This means that no matter what I do as long as I am in accordance with God’s will, everything will turn out for the best in the end.God has promised to give me hope and a future and to bless my life.However, when two parties that do not share norms of communication [customary patterns and rules of communication] and expectations about behavior must interact, they often clash. Each party may believe that its ways of doing things and thinking about things is the best way and come to regard other ways of thinking and acting as inferior, strange, or morally wrong. Moral conflict occurs when disputants are acting within different social worlds, according to different meanings. Indeed, one of the reasons groups in conflict have trouble breaking the pattern of interaction between them is that each is caught in its own moral order.When two groups have radically different ways of making sense of human life, it is likely that actions regarded by one side as good and prudent will be perceived by the other as evil or foolish. This is because an action that one moral order deems perfectly acceptable may be regarded as an abomination by a different moral order.