Tags: Me Writing An EssayUsability Testing Research PaperPolar Bear Research PaperPacific University Mfa Creative WritingSympathy For Oedipus EssayA Good Topic For A Research PaperProquest Dissertation SearchAmerican History Research PaperP.E Gcse Coursework Help
The research team identified four generic types of decisions that might be made regarding alternative container transport systems: â¢ Support for research and development. The general scale of financial commitment rises roughly a thousand-fold, from thousands of dollars in research support to millions of dollars for demonstrations to billions of dollars for construction.â¢ Readiness for incorporation or anticipation in other projects. The complexity and rigor of the evaluation method should rise accordingly.49 Overview Objectives The research team developed the following specific objectives for evaluation method development: â¢ The process must consider the goal being pursued and the scope and nature of the decision being made.
â¢ Motor carriers, ocean carriers, terminal operators, importers, exporters, and other container shipping industry participants.
â¢ National, state, and regional transportation planners and officials. â¢ Researchers at national laboratories and higher-education institutions.
The rigor and depth of the selection process should be matched to the decision being made, with comparative rankings being suitable for early-stage research support and extensive quantification being required for multi-billion-dollar construction commitments.
Potential Users Many stakeholders are involved with landside transport of ocean containers.
â¢ The method should recognize that the no-project scenario is not static.
Thesis Proposal Evaluation Criteria
â¢ The process must consider uncertainty and risk. All the approaches considered in this study share some steps: â¢ Setting goals. The list of criteria can range from a conceptual âwish listâ to a set of weighted performance criteria with technical metrics.
The early identification of âfatal flawsâ is very important.
â¢ The process should be efficient, providing for the rapid and easy screening of alternatives to focus most of the effort and resources on the most promising proposals.
It must specifically account for the goals or objectives of the decisionmaker.
â¢ The process must enable users to balance economic, technical, environmental, and social factors.