By denying citizenship to the inhabitants of the territory of the Philippines in the Insular Case Downes v. H) the Supreme Court demonstrated that the Constitution did not “follow the flag”, thereby proving that the United States had no intention of granting new territories equal status to states; they would instead be colonies serving American economic interests that contrasted with the settlement-based expansion of past decades.
By denying citizenship to the inhabitants of the territory of the Philippines in the Insular Case Downes v. H) the Supreme Court demonstrated that the Constitution did not “follow the flag”, thereby proving that the United States had no intention of granting new territories equal status to states; they would instead be colonies serving American economic interests that contrasted with the settlement-based expansion of past decades.Tags: What Is The Correct For Writing A Cover LetterTarget Business PlanThe Red Tree By Shaun Tan EssayQuestions Help Write Essay650 Essay WithExamples Of Dissertation TopicsTransition Words For A Research PaperFeminism In Fairy Tales EssayWho To Write An Essay For UniversityAnalysis Essay Everyday Use Alice Walker
This entailed competition with other nations in an imperialist race to claim foreign territory.
In his 1899 book The Interest of America in Sea Power (Doc. Mahan expressed the need for America to prevent foreign acquisition of ideal territories that would serve American economic interests.
Between this period there was a lot of continuation of expansionism plus there was also a lot of departure of expansionism in the country.
Many things contributed to this expansionism such as the American Diplomacy in China and the Gentleman’s Agreement in Japan all contributed to the expansion of the United States.
Past expansion had involved annexing adjacent territory contiguous with the existing states that enabled the spread of American settlement; it was utilized for the spread of agriculture and the American population, and all acquired territory was intended to ultimately become states.
Contrastingly, new territory in the age of imperialism was acquired with the economic intent of use as a colony: a provider of raw materials and markets for the products of industrialism.He further mentioned the pressure that other expanding empires were exerting upon the United States to acquire crucial territories before another power did.Jingoists Henry Cabot Lodge and Theodore Roosevelt answered this demand by supporting entrance into the Spanish-American war, primarily to acquire new territory; Roosevelt ordered the taking of Manila Bay from Spain’s Philippine territory the moment war was declared in 1898.DBQ – Imperialism: To what extent was late nineteenth-century and early twentieth-century United States expansionism a continuation of past United States expansionism and to what extent was it a departure?By the year 1901, the United States possessed the third-largest navy in the world, a considerable overseas empire, and a burgeoning reputation as a world power.Whereas the United States expansionism of the late nineteenth- and early twentieth-centuries was a clear continuation of the social and cultural principles that had fueled the nation’s past expansionism, it was to a greater degree a departure from the methods of the past through its pursuit of new economic and political motives.American imperialism of the late 1800s and early 1900s demonstrated the same cultural and social justification of previous expansionism.Josiah Strong reaffirmed this ethnocentricity in his book Our Country: Its Possible Future and Its Present Crisis (Doc.B) as he described the holy mission of the Anglo-Saxon race to spread civil liberty and Christianity throughout continents across the globe.F) in 1904 the responsibility of the United States to monitor and maintain the social and political stability of all nations in the Western Hemisphere.He compared his nation to an international police force that would inevitably dominate the affairs of all Latin American nations.